Welcome back to the Dershow. Today, obviously, we're going to talk about the verdict that

just came down in the Gene Carroll versus Donald Trump civil rape case, strange, strange

verdict. And one that will be a Roshak test, obviously, for those who support Trump, it

will be a victory for those who oppose Trump. It will be a defeat. Let's first set out

the facts. So anybody can decide for themselves. The main charge against Donald Trump was that

he raped, he raped Miss Carroll in a changing room and burged off good men. And the judge

told the jury what rape meant. And it included what she claimed happened to her, namely that

Donald Trump forcibly and without consent inserted his fingers and then his private parts

into her vagina. That clearly constitutes rape. That was the major charge. The jury obviously

didn't believe her. The jury said, no, he did not rape her. Remember, this is not a criminal

case. In a criminal case, if you get an acquittal, you can't say the jury necessarily didn't

believe her because they could have said, yeah, she's probably telling the truth. But we

have a reasonable doubt. In the criminal case, you have to prove guilt beyond a reasonable

doubt. Not in a civil case. In a civil case, you have to prove it by 50.1 to 49.9. Basically,

you have to prove it or disprove it. And the way I interpret this jury verdict, it's

they just didn't believe her testimony that she was raped. All right. But then they did

believe her testimony apparently that she was subject to sexual abuse and battery. In

other words, what they seem to be saying is that we believe the part that says they went

into the dressing room together and he touched her and grabbed her inappropriately. But we don't

believe the part that he actually raped her. It's very hard to understand how a jury can

come to that conclusion. But you know, jury's in civil cases, nine people and they came

to the unanimous conclusion. Then they also came to the unanimous conclusion that Donald

...