meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freakonomics Radio

Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses?

Freakonomics Radio

Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Documentary, Society & Culture

4.532.9K Ratings

🗓️ 11 April 2024

⏱️ 50 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

People who are good at their jobs routinely get promoted into bigger jobs they’re bad at. We explain why firms keep producing incompetent managers — and why that’s unlikely to change.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hey there, it's Stephen Dubner. This week we wanted to share an episode from our archives.

0:08.7

That's one of our most popular episodes, perhaps because it talks about a problem that many of us have had.

0:16.1

It's called Why Are There So Many Bad Bosses? I hope you enjoy it.

0:20.5

And if by chance you have already listened to this episode,

0:23.7

do stick around to the end for a career update from this person.

0:29.1

My name's Katie Johnson, and I'm a data scientist.

0:33.1

Johnson is 33 years old and lives in England.

0:35.9

She grew up near Bristol, went to university in Birmingham, and held a series of increasingly impressive jobs at a series of companies.

0:43.7

These were all what are known as IC jobs.

0:46.1

I see standing for individual contributor, which means what?

0:50.5

It is someone who makes, as opposed to managing people who make.

0:56.1

Johnson loved being an icy.

0:58.7

She loved analyzing data, and she was really good at her job.

1:03.1

But after a while, she thought it might be nice to become a boss.

1:07.5

Yeah, I wanted to manage more and more people.

1:09.8

And you wanted to manage more people because why?

1:12.8

You were just power hungry like the rest of us? I think there's a couple of reasons. So the first

1:18.1

is that I wanted to start getting more autonomy over what I was working on. I would be working

1:23.6

on stuff in my IC role and I think this isn't the most important thing. And I thought that

1:28.0

if I became the leader of the team, then I would get to pick what I worked on. Okay, that seems

1:34.0

sensible. The other reason was to have more impact at the companies I was working at. So you could

1:40.0

describe this as having a seat at the table. Also sensible. I guess the final reason is that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.