meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Rock & Roll Politics with Steve Richards

Why are the right obsessed with Ed Miliband?

Rock & Roll Politics with Steve Richards

Podmasters

News, Society & Culture, Politics

4.7908 Ratings

🗓️ 20 March 2026

⏱️ 53 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

With the departure of Morgan McSweeney, the right in the media and well beyond detect that Ed Miliband has become the unofficial prime minister.  The Spectator editor Michael Gove has written an article on this theme, and is by no means alone. Apparently some of those making the same point used to work for Keir Starmer. But do Gove’s arguments make much sense? Time again to forensically examine a single article. Get tickets here for the York Book Festival with Steve Richards and Alan Johnson on Tuesday March 24th. Rock & Roll Politics is at the Cambridge Literary Festival on Saturday April 25th. And you can get your tickets for Rock & Roll Politics -The Election Special, at Kings Place on Monday May 11th here. Subscribe to Patreon for live events, bonus podcasts and to get the regular podcast a day early and ad free.  Written and presented by Steve Richards. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to rock and roll politics, the podcast with me, Steve Richards.

0:16.2

Thank you so much for tuning in.

0:18.8

We've got a lot to cram in in our time together. I'm taking a break in

0:23.4

inverted commas from the war and focusing on another theme, which is why the right is obsessed

0:31.5

with Ed Miliband. And by the right, I don't just mean the right in terms of the Tory party and beyond, but also

0:39.4

the right of the Labour Party. It is a very interesting, the obsession. And what I'm going to do,

0:46.0

if it's okay with you, is take one example of the obsession, which is an article that Michael Gove,

0:52.9

the editor of the spectator, has written for this week's magazine.

0:58.0

One of the joys of podcasts is you can sort of forensically examine a case.

1:03.9

I remember doing the same with an article Kier Stama wrote again in inverted commas because he didn't, I'm sure, write a word of it,

1:12.4

part of his detached leadership style in opposition. He wrote a piece for the observer.

1:19.2

And it was just full of banalities and echoes, but imitations never work of the sort of Blair's arguments in the sort of

1:32.7

2002, 2003, 2004 period about the centre ground that the era of tax and spend is over.

1:44.4

What does that mean?

1:45.2

Look at them at the moment,

1:46.7

having had to put up taxes left, right and center,

1:49.3

and struggling to find the money for police, prisons,

1:53.9

social care, etc.

1:55.3

I mean, it was all meaningless.

1:57.0

And that forensic examination, it was, listen back, listen back, because it provided a clue, I think,

2:05.3

as to why they were bound to struggle in government. They were already going to win by then,

2:12.0

although it was part of the tragedy, really, of the build-up to that 24 election. Some of them feared they might not.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Podmasters, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Podmasters and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.