meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
City Journal Audio

Who We Are: Race and Meritocracy

City Journal Audio

Manhattan Institute

News Commentary, News, Politics

4.7656 Ratings

🗓️ 21 January 2026

⏱️ 59 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jason L. Riley, senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute and one of the most incisive voices in today's debates over race and public policy, joins Rafael Mangual to discuss how the Left frames racial disparities to advance a victimhood mentality, rather than solutions rooted in responsibility, opportunity, and community empowerment.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hello and welcome to another special episode of the City Journal podcast.

0:12.4

I am so delighted to be joined by one of my most brilliant colleagues, Jason L. Riley.

0:18.0

Welcome to the show.

0:19.0

Glad to be here, Ralph.

0:20.0

So you are one of the scholars at the Manhattan Institute that I have been reading for a long time since long before I joined the Manhattan Institute.

0:29.7

And it's always been refreshing to read your work.

0:34.0

And in part because of what you've had to say on an issue that I think is embedded

0:39.6

throughout the entirety of the public policy discourse, and that is race.

0:43.9

For as long as I can remember, things like racial disparities have informed how we talk about

0:50.5

everything from health care reform to criminal justice reform to immigration and

0:55.6

welfare. And it just seems like getting a proper understanding of what the role of race and

1:01.2

society is is actually really key to developing the ability to navigate public policy debates

1:07.1

in an effective way. And when I was kind of coming up as a young man and thinking through

1:12.4

my own politics, race was the issue that really kind of introduced me to the ideas of the

1:18.0

American right in part because it seemed to me from where I was at the time, you know, my late

1:24.3

teenage years, that really what distinguished left and right on race was the

1:29.3

following. On the right, you were kind of racial conservative if you believed that life

1:35.6

outcomes were largely determined by personal actions, by personal choices. Whereas if you were

1:41.7

on the left on race, life outcomes were largely explained

1:45.1

by this broader phenomenon of racism or racial discrimination. Do you think that's a kind of

1:51.5

accurate way to frame this thing? And how did you kind of come to this issue?

1:56.8

I do think that's one way to do it. And I think it is fairly accurate, this idea of agency that racial and ethnic minority groups are somewhat helpless in the face of society and society's impact on them, that they don't have the freedom to sort of

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Manhattan Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Manhattan Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.