Guys, I want to let you know that tonight I'm going to release a new teaser trailer for my new film.

The film will be out in April, but the trailer is going to open your eyes quite a bit.

So keep an eye out for it. It's going to be, I think, exploding on the scene tonight.

Now, coming up, I'm going to talk about Biden, who is equating voting rights and voter integrity bills with Jim Crow.

Raising the question, of course, who was Jim Crow? What was Jim Crow all about?

I'm also going to reveal how Biden, not Trump, has turned out to be Putin's pet.

Harriet Hagueman, the Trump-endores candidate who's running against Liz Jaini, is going to join me to talk about the evolution of Liz Jaini.

I'm going to ask whether Asian Americans are going to follow Hispanics and start making a kind of move toward the GOP.

And finally, I'm going to continue my discussion of romantic irony and pushkins Eugene Onigin. This is the Dineshtus who's a podcast.

The Democrats do not have the votes to pass their voting rights act.

This is the terrible piece of legislation that would federalize elections and really overturn all the voter integrity laws that have been passed in so many different states.

The Democrats are desperate to do this. But to do it, they have to overcome the filibuster. Well, it's not even clear that they have the 51 votes, but they certainly don't have 60.

And so they are simultaneously pushing the voting rights bill and at the same time they're railing on the filibuster and they're trying to make life miserable for cinema and mansion.

And they're going through this kind of theater which seems to have a known outcome. But nevertheless, they're pushing it through anyway.

I think they feel like if we can get mansion on the record, we can get cinema on the record. This will somehow maybe pressure them to change their mind.

Joe Biden, who's a pawn of this whole operation recently tweeted, and I'm going to put this up on the screen so you can take a look while I'm reading it to you.

His favorite phrase these days is Jim Crow 2.0. Jim Crow 2.0. He goes, Jim Crow 2.0 is about two insidious things. Let's see what they are.

Voter suppression, voter suppression and election subversion. He goes, it's about making it harder to vote and who gets to count the vote and whether your vote counts at all.

Now, this is really over the top rhetoric because, well, I mean, you would think that somebody making these kinds of claims would be able to produce a long procession of people who have been trying to vote but have been unable to vote voter suppression.

Then he goes on, it's about who gets to count the vote as if election integrity bills are somehow creating a Republican counting teams that can somehow rig the vote and whether your vote counts at all as if you've now got a committee that's throwing out votes into the trash.

I mean, this is beyond the pale.

And even the equation to Jim Crow obviously raises the question, what was Jim Crow? Who was Jim Crow? People used that for Jim Crow, Jim Crow. But who was Jim Crow? Well, Jim Crow was a kind of persona, a character, both in writing as well as in the theater.

...