Hello and welcome back to Sociology 101 live.

Someone was asking me, how do you put out so much content?

Every day you've put out content.

Actually, I think this is only the third episode I've done since the debate back in March 7th. And prior to that, I didn't do any

except for the pre-debat show. And that's because of our good friend Caleb, who does so much

work, going back in the archives, finding those two hour long

videos, four hour long videos, whatever it is, and finding clips of 15-minute clips, you know,

here and there, that he'll rebroadcast, like the one that was put out yesterday, was a

rebroadcast from another episode, which you sometimes can tell from my background as being

different, or my weight is up or down, best upon what time a year it is. And so different things.

And today I have hat head. You know, I was wearing a hat when I was walking this morning to get

my exercise in and I, and that's why I was delaying. I was like, I can't get rid of this hat head.

There's marks on my head from wearing a hat. Anyway, all fun stuff with live broadcasting.

And so I wanted to jump on and respond to the rogue Calvinist.

Usually, I haven't taken time to respond to him because he's not a very charitable fellow.

And I tend not to reward or try to reward or stage those who don't put one, put their name out there.

I don't like when people use fake names.

I don't like it when they're

very uncharitable. But this was a particularly good episode for us to respond to because I think

it really highlights some major points. The accusation and misrepresentation is abounds in these

discussions. And I just want to say that I think if you put our broadcast up next to any of the major

Calvinistic YouTubers out there and compare their representation of provisionism or

...