The WHO and some of their antics really done in plain view here.

So the headline, this is the main wire, it's just a small little organization,

but it says WHO deletes naturally acquired immunity from its website.

Now, let's go to the Internet Archive and this was from October.

And this is what they had to say on herd immunity.

The WHO definition of herd immunity says herd immunity is the indirect protection from an infectious disease

that happens when a population is immune either through vaccination or immunity developed through previous infection.

Now that was at October and the October.

Now let's go to about the same time in November, about a month, a month later.

So the WHO suddenly has the same paragraph, but it's different herd immunity,

also known as population immunity, it says, is a concept used for vaccination

in which a population can be protected from a certain virus if a threshold of vaccination is reached.

Her immunity is achieved by protecting people from a virus not by exposing them to it.

Whoa, whoa, I mean, just an absolute disgrace to the known science that has kept us alive until this very moment.

They're actually going against why we exist on this planet before we ever had vaccines

because immunity is developed once you've had the virus or the bacteria and survived that interaction.

And by the way, always so far in history have long immunity,

had you gotten the virus or bacteria naturally versus when it's injected.

What, and again, a combination of science, just crazy.

Right, and despite the WHO's flip-flopping back and forth there,

there really has been a scientific consensus throughout this pandemic response,

kind of hidden in plain sight.

...