meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Things Unseen with Sinclair B. Ferguson

Who Can Be against Us?

Things Unseen with Sinclair B. Ferguson

Ligonier Ministries

Religion & Spirituality, Christianity

4.91.7K Ratings

🗓️ 2 September 2025

⏱️ 6 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

If God is for us, then all the devil's efforts to destroy us will ultimately fail. Today, Sinclair Ferguson expresses how we can come to the deep, unshakable conviction that the Lord Himself is on our side.

Read the transcript: https://ligonier.org/podcasts/things-unseen-with-sinclair-ferguson/who-can-be-against-us/

A donor-supported outreach of Ligonier Ministries. Donate: https://donate.ligonier.org/

Explore all of our podcasts: https://www.ligonier.org/podcasts

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Tuesday's Things Unseen.

0:11.7

And first of all, maybe I should apologize for leaving you dangling on the edge of a cliff yesterday when I signed off.

0:18.8

But I did say that today I'd tell you what strikes me as being

0:22.7

a rather unusual feature of Romans 8 verses 28 to 39 and specifically of verses 31 to 35. And I do

0:31.7

think it's really quite significant. And when you notice it for the first time, as I said, it tends to stick in your mind.

0:39.9

So what is it?

0:41.7

Well, it's the fact that this series of verses is actually framed by a rapid-fire series of questions.

0:50.0

If God is for us, who can be against us?

0:52.9

Who shall bring any charge against God's elect?

0:56.0

Who is to condemn?

0:57.7

Who shall separate us from the love of Christ?

1:01.3

It's not just the simple fact that there's this rapid-fire series of questions that strikes

1:06.4

me as significant here.

1:08.6

Of course, you get a sense from Paul that he's got tremendous confidence

1:12.7

that nothing can withstand the purposes of God or the power of the gospel. But what's significant,

1:19.1

I think, is that all of these questions begin with the same interrogative pronoun. And it's

1:26.1

not just that the interrogative pronoun is the same each time. It's that the

1:31.7

interrogative pronoun on each occasion is a personal pronoun. He doesn't ask what, but who? It's

1:41.8

not what can be against us, or what can constitute a charge against us or what can

1:46.6

condemn us or what shall separate us. It's who, who, who, who, who all the time. And that surely

1:56.8

can't be accidental. After all, when he asks his fourth question, he goes on to give

2:02.5

a list of potential separators, doesn't he? Tribulation, distress, persecution, famine, nakedness,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Ligonier Ministries, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Ligonier Ministries and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.