meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

Where will the Downing Street psychodrama end?

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Politics, Government, Daily News

4.42.1K Ratings

🗓️ 26 April 2021

⏱️ 21 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Downing Street psychodrama continues today, with the Daily Mail reporting that Boris Johnson said he would rather see the 'bodies pile high in their thousands' than order a third lockdown. Where will the war between the PM and his former adviser Dominic Cummings end? Katy Balls speaks to Fraser Nelson and James Forsyth.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management, award-winning wealth managers who go above and beyond to support and guide you.

0:09.2

Visit can-dowealth.com to start building your wealth with confidence.

0:17.6

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots, the spectator's daily politics podcast. I'm Katie Balls

0:22.9

and I'm joined by Fraser Nelson and James Forsyfe. We're on day four, the latest Tory psychodrama, after number 10

0:30.2

briefed that Dominic Cummings was in the Prime Minister's mind behind several leaks. Dominic

0:35.0

Cummings hit back with an explosive blog. And there are more

0:38.6

leaks in the papers today. The latest leak, though we do not officially know who that's from,

0:43.7

is in the Daily Mail. And this is that Boris Johnson has been accused of saying that he would

0:47.4

rather allow bodies to pile high on their thousands than impose another lockdown late last year.

0:53.5

Now, Downing Street has strongly denied he made this

0:55.5

remark dismissing it as just another lie. We'll get into the wider after enough, but James,

1:02.0

hearing that quote, where do you think this is going? Clearly the day you may believe they have

1:06.6

the grounds to allege that the Prime Minister did say this despite the fact that Number 10 are pushing very

1:12.1

hard against the idea that Prime Minister would. Unless there is a recording of this, I find this very

1:17.2

hard. This is going to be a he said, she said, right? Because this is not the kind of comment

1:21.9

that gets ministered in the notes of a meeting, right? This is going to be Simon Waters' source

1:26.9

saying that the Prime Minister

1:28.1

did say this and number 10 saying, no, he didn't say this. And so unless there are these

1:32.3

recordings which have been talked about a bit over the weekend, unless those exist of this

1:36.7

comment, I don't, I don't mean this is going to settle one way or the other because the source will

1:40.6

claim he said it and Boris Johnson will deny that he said it. You heard Ben Wallace on the today program this morning kind of denying very emphatically that had been said.

1:47.9

And as you said, number 10 have also denied that.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.