meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Advisory Opinions

Where’s the Beef?

Advisory Opinions

The Dispatch

News, Politics, Government

4.83.6K Ratings

🗓️ 20 October 2022

⏱️ 61 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In today’s packed episode, David and Sarah check in on the Durham investigation after recent failures to reach convictions. They then turn to updates on the special master and the Mar-a-Lago case, and on the growing list of challenges (of varying quality) to Biden’s loan forgiveness plan. Not enough? They conclude with an overview of the Texas Pete Hot Sauce lawsuit.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

You ready?

0:02.0

I was born ready.

0:04.0

Welcome to the advisory opinions podcast. I'm David French with Sarah Isger and we've got

0:25.4

a few things to cover here. There was an acquittal in the Durham probe yesterday. This is the

0:32.4

probe into the origins of the Trump era Russia investigation. There was a hearing in the

0:40.4

special master case involving Donald Trump and the collection of classified and other documents

0:48.1

from Mar-a-Lago that included a famous question from the 1980s. We've got a student loan update

0:56.9

and if we have time, we will talk about something I don't know anything about at all, but Sarah

1:03.7

does and it's called the Texas Pete lawsuit.

1:07.5

David, frankly, it's a travesty that we haven't covered it yet. I've gotten several complaints

1:12.2

as a Jackson. I was having a run. Yes, so hold on to your horses.

1:17.4

Hold on. Okay. So should we start with it?

1:21.2

Absolutely not, David. You've got to leave the people wanting more.

1:24.9

Okay. All right. Well, let's start with this. Okay.

1:30.6

Yesterday afternoon, got a news alert that Igor Denchenko, who was an analyst who provided a lot

1:37.2

of the, I'm going to use air quotes right now, research for the steel dossier about Donald Trump's

1:46.1

alleged ties with Russia, was acquitted on Tuesday of four counts of lying to the FBI,

1:55.2

one of the counts, he was charged with five counts, a jury acquitted him of four, judged

2:00.0

throughout the fifth. And here's how a piece by Charlie Savage and Linda Q in The New York Times

2:08.8

described it. They said the verdict was a final blow to the politically charged criminal

2:13.2

investigation by John Durham, the special counsel appointed by Attorney General William Bar,

2:18.2

three years ago to scour the FBI's inquiry into the Trump campaign's ties for any wrongdoing.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Dispatch, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Dispatch and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.