Welcome to the podcast. If you'd like to listen to an ad-free version of this episode and all of our

episodes, then search True Crime Today Premium Plus on Apple Podcasts and press subscribe.

That's our premium channel where all of our ad-free and advanced episodes live, all in one place.

True Crime Today Premium Plus. Search it on Apple Podcasts and press subscribe.

Even try it for three days free.

The blood washed away, but the guilt never does.

Welcome to Hidden Killers with Tony Bruske, featuring psychotherapist and author

Chauvonne Scott.

Let's talk about the request that we've seen now from the side of Diddy's attorneys.

They are requesting,

and this is on the federal level, that the accuser's names be released. This is interesting.

Obviously, there's a lot of thoughts here. It would certainly put some attention off of Diddy

and onto other people. It's argument that's being made, or the argument that's being made by Diddy's attorneys is that they need to release this, so it's not a guessing game when they're trying to investigate this and gather exculpatory evidence, do their job, basically.

You can't defend yourself against a ghost that you don't know the information

on. What do you think could happen here with these names being released? I mean, these accusers,

they, in the federal indictment, there's no guarantees that your name's not going to get out

there. Is it appropriate at this time that the feds do release these accusers' names just because, in the sake of justice, being effectively, you know, drawn out here.

They can defend themselves as they should be able to.

And we know the full details of who's claiming what here to determine the legitimacy.

Yeah, it's going to have to be released at some point. I don't know the

legal maneuvering at what point it's mandatory that that has to become evidence in order to

prepare the defense as they have a right to do. So that's just another hurdle that I think

...