What Untested Evidence Could Reshape Alex Murdaugh's Retrial?
True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Tony Brueski
4.2 • 612 Ratings
🗓️ 24 May 2026
⏱️ 50 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Defense counsel Jim Griffin confirmed at a press conference that unknown male DNA was recovered from beneath Maggie Murdaugh's fingernails during the original investigation and was never submitted to CODIS for comparison. The defense has indicated it intends to pursue that evidence at retrial.
The DNA disclosure accompanies a broader catalog of alleged investigative deficiencies the defense plans to present to a second jury. Tire impressions at the crime scene were reportedly never properly processed. GPS data from Maggie Murdaugh's phone was allegedly overwritten. Crime scene integrity was compromised by weather exposure and foot traffic from family members prior to full processing. The medical examiner reportedly estimated time of death by touch rather than standard forensic methodology. These issues were largely subordinated during the first trial by twelve hours of financial crimes testimony — testimony the Supreme Court has now ordered to be sharply curtailed.
Retrial preparation is extensive. The defense is reviewing an eight-thousand-page trial transcript — effectively an impeachment roadmap, as every prosecution witness is now locked into sworn testimony. New expert witnesses are being retained. The defense does not anticipate the retrial commencing before next year.
Venue presents a contested procedural question. The defense is considering a change-of-venue motion, but the receiving jurisdiction must approximate Colleton County's demographic composition. Griffin noted that Richland and Charleston counties would likely fail that standard. Harpootlian cited the Pee Wee Gaskins precedent regarding individual voir dire necessitated by pretrial publicity saturation.
The Attorney General's reported decision to place the death penalty on the table creates an additional procedural dimension — capital charges automatically trigger individual juror screening, which aligns with the defense's stated preference. The federal civil rights lawsuit against Becky Hill under Section 1983 continues to function as a parallel discovery mechanism. The defense has stated publicly that no plea agreement will be considered.
Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod
This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.
#AlexMurdaugh #MaggieMurdaugh #DNAEvidence #CODIS #MurdaughRetrial #SLED #Section1983 #BeckyHill #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This is the big breakdown. |
| 0:02.2 | A long look back at some of the biggest stories we're covering for you at the Hidden Killers podcast and true crime today. |
| 0:10.4 | This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Bruske and Robin Drink. |
| 0:16.5 | The retrial of Alec Murdoch is coming up. |
| 0:19.3 | The attorneys laid out what the retrial is actually |
| 0:21.9 | going to look like, including timeline expectations, venue considerations, new post-trial |
| 0:28.6 | information. Alec Murdoz's personal reaction to the Supreme Court ruling and their absolute |
| 0:34.0 | refusal to consider any plea deal. We are covering the practical roadmap that they have described. |
| 0:40.9 | That's what we are breaking down here. |
| 0:43.3 | The team said that they do not expect a retrial this year, possibly within a year, but not by the end of the year. |
| 0:51.2 | And there's a lot to work through here. |
| 0:53.4 | You got the preparatory work, such as the |
| 0:56.9 | 8,000-page transcript to review, discovery scrub, new experts. If we're talking about the next |
| 1:05.2 | trial of Alec Murdoch, who'd already said, at least a year. So maybe around this time next year, maybe a little bit further out. |
| 1:13.9 | Where do you think, Bob? |
| 1:15.4 | How far out do you think this needs to be for adequate time for both sides to prepare that both will agree on? |
| 1:23.9 | At least a year. |
| 1:25.5 | At least a year. |
| 1:26.4 | You know, especially for the state, like Waters, because they narrowed down what financial |
| 1:32.3 | crimes are going to come in. |
| 1:33.3 | And again, that really set the stage. |
| 1:36.8 | Like that painted him as the shitbag. |
... |
Transcript will be available on the free plan in 14 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Tony Brueski, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Tony Brueski and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

