meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

What the Chauvin Jury is Actually Deliberating

Brian Lehrer: A Daily Politics Podcast

WNYC Studios

History, Politics, Public, 2020, Journalism, News, Wnyc, News Commentary, Daily News, Brian, Lehrer, Radio, Daily, Election

4.4675 Ratings

🗓️ 20 April 2021

⏱️ 30 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The jury in the Derek Chauvin trial is in deliberations, and a verdict is expected soon. So what issues are they considering, and how strong is each sides' case?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

I'm Brian Lehrer. This is my daily politics podcast from WNYC Studios. It's Tuesday, April 20th.

0:14.9

As the jury deliberates in the Derek Chauvin trial, let's look at what's likely going on in the jury room with an eye

0:21.7

not just on yesterday's closing arguments, which of course have gotten a lot of media play,

0:26.3

but also the makeup of the jury and the judge's instructions to the jury, which don't get much

0:32.0

media play, but which WNYC legal editor and race and justice editor Jamie Floyd says could be crucial to the outcome.

0:40.0

With us now is WNYC legal editor and race and justice editor, Jamie Floyd,

0:45.0

who has covered trials for more than 25 years and participated in them as an attorney before that.

0:52.2

Behind the scenes here, Jamie has circulated an explainer on various

0:56.5

aspects of the trial that we all found extremely illuminating, so we'll use that as somewhat

1:01.6

of a guide to looking at the state of the case at this moment. Hey, Jamie, welcome back to the show.

1:07.8

Good morning, Brian. And let's talk about the judge's instructions. I'll play a clip in a

1:13.1

minute from Judge Peter Cahill's instructions as broadcast on TV yesterday. But in general,

1:19.1

why do you say judge's instructions, which we might think of as generally neutral, could affect the

1:25.4

outcome? It's often the most boring part of the trial, Brian. There's no neutral could affect the outcome.

1:30.9

It's often the most boring part of the trial, Brian.

1:34.1

There's no witness sobbing on the witness stand.

1:38.4

The judge is generally reading from an instructions manual.

1:42.5

In this case, Judge Cahill, I believe, read from his own instructions,

1:47.3

largely written by himself, which made it a little more interesting. And he was very efficient. 20 minutes before the closing arguments and another

1:53.9

eight minutes thereafter, a really illuminating way to do it. So the jurors could lean into what the

2:00.8

judge had told them to listen for in the closing arguments. Quite a smart way to do it so the jurors could lean into what the judge had told them to listen for

2:02.6

in the closing arguments. Quite a smart way to do it. Here's why it matters, Brian. The instructions

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from WNYC Studios, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of WNYC Studios and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.