You ready?

I was born ready. Welcome to Advisory opinions. I'm Sarah Isger and I've got special guest David French joining me. We're so

thrilled to have you David. It's always a pleasure Sarah. Thank you for having me.

First off we did get an update from the Fifth Circuit on that immigration case involving

SB 4 after the hearing that the Fifth

Circuit held on the injunction and the stay pending appeal that did not go well for the state of Texas. It won't be any

surprise that the Fifth Circuit Merits panel decided to keep that injunction in place.

So SB 4 is still not in effect in Texas. That was exactly what everyone

thought would happen after the hearing and now we move on to the merits and

just hang out. But David, we had two really interesting cases at the Supreme Court, one on Miffa Pressstone, the abortion-inducing drug, and one on retaliatory arrest. But I know everyone wants to start with Miffa Pressstone.

Give the people what they want, as you say, David.

We talked about this case several times

since the court granted it.

The district court had a huge, very expansive finding

against the FDA going all the way back to its original

approval of the drug, way back in 2000 roughly. The Fiscer get narrowed

that holding but still held that the FDA's expansion of the drugs use and its mail was in violation of the APA and various FDA

regulations and that is what the fifth circuit sorry the Supreme Court then agreed to take.

Now, by definition, the Supreme Court taking that,

we've said before, generally means statistically

that they are likely to overturn the circuit court.

And in particular, we've talked about how

...