meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Moral Maze

What should we do about inherited inequality?

Moral Maze

BBC

Society & Culture, Religion & Spirituality

4.5609 Ratings

🗓️ 9 January 2025

⏱️ 57 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In every species, including homo sapiens, the family is nature’s way of passing inequality down the generations. The family gives us our genetic make-up and a large proportion of our training, education, socialisation and cultural attitudes. It may bequeath to us wealth or poverty. None of this is fair.

Should we get cross about silver spoons and livid about nepotism? We don’t seem to. Inheritance tax is deeply unpopular (not just with farmers). And it's not merely money that tilts the scales when a child is born. There's the where and when of it, there's parental character and competence, there are genetic pluses and minuses. How should we, as a society, address the unfairness that results from inherited advantage? And how can we know whether it’s made a difference? Everyone claims to want equality of opportunity. Some of us want to measure our success by equality of outcome; the rest of us say ‘dream on.’

Should we aim to eradicate or compensate for inherited inequality? Should we try to correct for the effects of genetic and environmental misfortune? Or should we just accept that, in the words of William Blake, 'Some are Born to sweet delight. Some are Born to Endless Night'?

Chair: Michael Buerk Panel: Tim Stanley, Ash Sarkar, James Orr and Mona Siddiqui Witnesses: Aaron Reeves, Ruth Porter, Will Snell, Edward Davies.

Producers: Dan Tierney and Peter Everett. Editor: Tim Pemberton

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

BBC Sounds, Music, Radio, podcasts.

0:04.9

Good evening. You're lucky to be alive.

0:07.4

That particular sperm at your conception was a 250 million to one shot.

0:12.8

Multipied back through the generations, the chances against you existing at all far exceed the number of atoms in the universe.

0:20.1

So it's a bit much to expect such unlikely

0:22.6

life to be fair. It isn't. Politicians invade against inherited advantage, but cannot legislate

0:29.3

for genetics. Your intelligence, to some extent your health, to a debatable degree your character,

0:35.1

are predetermined by your parents. They organise your education.

0:39.3

More, a caring home, a house full of books, the options and wide horizons of prosperity,

0:44.6

all influence, even if they don't entirely define your path through life.

0:49.2

We pay lip service to the idea of a quality of opportunity, but regard doing the best for our own children

0:55.0

as an unqualified virtue. Inheritance tax is deeply unpopular, even among those unlikely ever to

1:01.7

pay it, because it runs counter to our idea of family and the hierarchy of concern that it demands.

1:08.4

How far should we try to eradicate or compensate for inherited inequality?

1:13.4

That's our moral maze tonight.

1:15.3

The panel, Ash Sarka, from the Novara Media Group,

1:18.7

Mona Siddiqui, Professor of Islamic and Inter-Religious Studies

1:21.6

at Edinburgh University,

1:23.1

James Orr, Associate Professor of the Philosophy of Religion

1:26.1

at Cambridge University, and the historian Tim Stanley.

1:30.0

Ash, did you inherit privilege?

1:33.0

Yeah, my mother's winning smile.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from BBC, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of BBC and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.