meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

What's next for the DUP?

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Politics, Government, Daily News

4.42.1K Ratings

🗓️ 28 April 2021

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Arlene Foster has stepped down as leader of the Democratic Unionist Party. What's next for the party? Isabel Hardman speaks to James Forsyth and Katy Balls.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management, award-winning wealth managers who go above and beyond to support and guide you.

0:09.2

Visit can-dowealth.com to start building your wealth with confidence.

0:18.6

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots, The Spectators' Daily Politics Podcast. I'm Isabel

0:23.9

Hartman and I'm joined by James Forsyth and Katie Balls. Well, shortly before Prime

0:28.7

Minister's questions today, the Electoral Commission announced it would be launching a probe

0:33.5

into the financing of the Downing Street flat revamp.

0:39.3

James, what has happened?

0:44.3

So the electoral commissioner have said that there are reasons to be for an offence or offences may have been committed.

0:46.0

So they're now launching a kind of investigation into what happened.

0:50.3

At the moment, this appears to be an investigation into how the Conservative Party handled it.

0:56.2

Now, I don't mean that is the end of the matter for Boris Johnson, because however the Conservative Party handled it,

1:03.7

there are questions about what should have been declared in the Register of Members' interests and the register of minister's interest.

1:11.6

Now, we know that Christopher Geith, the Queen's former private secretary, is now coming in as a new

1:16.1

independent advisor on the ministerial code and that he is going to look at the flat.

1:22.4

Boris Johnson said at PMQ's today, in a distinctly touchy performance, to put it mildly,

1:29.6

that the Guyt would look at what further declarations, if any, he needed to make. I also think he said something which I think

1:34.5

is going to become hugely important. He said that he had officials have given him advice

1:39.8

throughout this process. Now, it seems to me that it would be very odd if the Electoral Commission did

1:45.0

not ask to see this advice, to understand what had happened. Now, I think one of the other

1:51.5

big consequences of the Electoral Commission is that I think that we are now surely going to

1:57.7

see the entire process play out, given the Electoral Commission's investigatory powers. And so the question then becomes whether number 10 maintains this

2:06.1

kind of current position of basically not providing any information beyond the statement that

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.