meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate News

What Next: Rapid Test Blues

Slate News

Slate Podcasts

News, News Commentary, Politics

4.66K Ratings

🗓️ 6 January 2022

⏱️ 25 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Back in March of 2020, a scientist working at MIT developed a rapid test for the novel coronavirus. It wasn’t quite as accurate as a PCR, but would have gone a long way in detecting infectious cases during the emerging pandemic. But her test was never approved—and today, the U.S. is still behind other developed countries in our mass testing scheme. Guest: Lydia Depillis, reporter for ProPublica. If you enjoy this show, please consider signing up for Slate Plus. Slate Plus members get benefits like zero ads on any Slate podcast, bonus episodes of shows like Slow Burn and Dear Prudence—and you’ll be supporting the work we do here on What Next. Sign up now at slate.com/whatnextplus to help support our work. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is brought to you by Slack. With Slack, you can bring all your people and

0:05.9

tools together in one place. It's your digital HQ where you can increase productivity,

0:11.1

enable flexibility and automate workflows. Plus, Slack is full of game-changing features,

0:16.9

like huddles for quick check-ins, or Slack Connect, which helps you connect with partners

0:20.9

inside and outside of your company. Slack. Where the future works, get started at

0:26.9

Slack.com slash DHQ.

0:35.9

If you needed a COVID test, right now, what is your strategy? Maybe you plan to go

0:44.9

wait in line for one of those PCR tests that'll get shipped off to a lab. Maybe you've got a

0:50.4

stash of ad home tests, squirreled away in your bathroom. Or maybe, like a lot of folks,

0:55.5

you're just hoping you're not going to need a test. I have got five little antigen tests in my

1:02.3

house, and I'm going to parcel them out based on nothing more than a gut reaction. How bad is

1:07.9

that headache? Just how exposed was my kid? And I'm one of the lucky ones. Even Lydia DePillis,

1:18.9

who writes about COVID testing over a pro-publica, doesn't have a secret for how to get your hands on

1:24.1

a nasal swab. I didn't have time to go out and get any before they were all gone in the pre-holiday

1:30.1

rush. And, you know, I don't have kids or a family, so I didn't have, you know, I kind of didn't

1:34.3

want to take up the supply by ordering a bunch on the internet. So I have a couple now, finally,

1:39.6

from the free distributions in DC, which started after the holidays very inconveniently, but they

1:46.8

are around now. Lydia says, the shortages you're hearing about now, especially for those ad home

1:52.9

tests. Some people call them lateral flow tests. They're actually the trickle-down impact of all kinds

1:58.8

of other shortages, which is what makes fixing this problem so hard. It's not just ordering up a

2:07.0

bunch of tests. It's also saying, okay, we have factories that need to produce the nitrocellulose

2:11.5

strips that go into lateral flow tests. We need to make sure there's capacity for producing swabs,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate Podcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate Podcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.