All right. We'll get back into college a little bit later.

I wanted to bring up a lion's issue, and we didn't get a chance to really get into it yesterday.

So now, look, a couple days have gone by.

You've processed your emotions about the Eagle game.

I think we're all on the same page.

Lines still a good football team.

They feel a little bit more like pretender to contender, but they have the ability to be a contender.

So here's the question I wanted to ask.

Dan Campbell had a lot to say yesterday.

And a lot of it was, look, we're going to play to the strengths of the team.

We had a bad day at the office, et cetera.

I wanted to ask this question is that, look, year over year, I think at this point,

even the most Kool-Aid drinking lion fan, who thinks the world is perfect and nothing's

wrong.

You can at least identify the following.

The O line is not the same.

You miss Ben Johnson. And a byproduct of that is,

the running game is not the same. And your third down conversions, you rank 27th in the NFL

in third down conversion rate. 27th. Those things seemingly are a very fair place to start when I ask you this question.

If you are not the same team you were, then aren't you required to play the game differently than you've played it?

Meaning, no one is saying you do what Wisconsin did and you go from a power running attack to the air raid with Luke Fickle.

What we're saying is we like aggression, we like force downs, we like the identity of the team.

...