and retrogrades. Today, on Rules for Retrogrades Live, we will be discussing John Paul

the 2nd. Some of you out there, I call these folks J2P2s, zzz, z, uh, will refer to him as

John Paul the Great. Many of you rightly refer to him as St. John Paul II.

These are technically honorifics for John Paul II, Pope John Paul II, the 264th Pope in the Roman Catholic

Church. And I will be discussing the errors in the teaching of John Paul

the 2nd. Now, I don't call him John Paul the Great. I don't happen to believe as a matter of

my opinion, as a layman, that he deserves that title i don't typically call

saint pope's saint i i love pious the pick pick which of several of the piouses are saints

and i don't use their saint honorific so when I'm discussing them I just call them pious

the 10th whatever Pio no no I don't think is a saint but but Pius the 10th is and I call them

pice the 9th Pius the 10th so I'm going to give you a layman's opinion

strongly evidenced on seven errors in the teaching of John Paul II, or at least unexplained

reversals in teaching.

Now, the teachings that are aired on in these seven areas by John Paul II are somewhere

in a gray area between irreformable and reformable doctrine, tending toward irreformability, I would say,

but technically they're not irreformable.

They're logically, according to natural reason, I'd say seven principles that cannot have reversed

in the late 1970s after 1970-some-odd years of Roman Catholic teaching.

And there's not a way that I've ever chased down by which a J2P2, this is a huge John Paul

the second fanboy. We all love them insofar as they're all of the saint

popes are saints in the church can explain to me how a logically, ostensibly irreformable

teaching, and let alone seven of them, can be reversed. So this is what I'm going to attempt to chase down and hopefully

...