meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

What Jenrick’s resignation means for Sunak’s premiership

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Daily News, Politics

4.42.2K Ratings

🗓️ 7 December 2023

⏱️ 17 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Kate Andrews speaks to James Heale and Katy Balls about Robert Jenrick's resignation last night and whether this is another sign of Tory party implosion. 

Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.


For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.


Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This episode is sponsored by Canacort Genuity Wealth Management,

0:04.0

experienced wealth planners and investment managers who offer unwavering support in challenging times.

0:10.0

Visit can do Wealth.com for more information.

0:13.0

Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots, the Spectators Daily Politics Podcast.

0:20.0

I'm Kate Andrews and I'm joined by Katie balls and James Heel.

0:24.0

Katie, Robert Genrick, the former immigration minister, has resigned.

0:29.0

Tell us what happened.

0:30.0

Yes, so I think as we've discussed on this podcast, I think that's quite a

0:34.3

precedent episode a few weeks ago, he said, has Robert Generate gone rogue?

0:38.4

The answer is yes. We know now definitively never let it be said this podcast does not have

0:47.0

its finger on the pulse now what happened is we had Rishi Sunak finally

0:52.1

unveiled his legislation for his plan B.

0:54.9

As for what that bill does, it is not quite the full-fat version, which Suella Brahma and others were calling

1:01.5

for, in the sense it does not have these notwithstanding

1:04.9

clauses on the E.C.R. It does still stretch the boundaries in terms of what is within international

1:11.8

law. So on the front of the bill you have a note from

1:14.5

James Cleveli, the Home Secretary saying that he cannot say this is definitely in line

1:19.7

with the ECHR. So it's definitely not the skimmed version I think you're somewhere

1:24.5

between semi-skinned and full fat I think it's a bit further than the middle

1:29.2

option lots we were talking about earlier in the week and but it is not going

1:32.4

quite well to have had a brahman wanted to.

1:34.7

When Ritchie Scenic addressed the 1992 committee, he did talk about this.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.