Welcome to hashtag S-Ear-Ask.

Greg.

Amy.

Here's the first question.

It comes from Richard.

What is your best answer when an atheist asks you to, quote, prove God exists?

I ask them what kind of proof would be adequate for them. The problem with this challenge is that the word prove has not been qualified. And you will never win with an atheist

who raises this issue. When I say win, I don't mean in a combative sense. You will never

be able to provide an answer that satisfies them. And the reason is, is because in their mind, I've just seen this over and over

again, in their mind, the standard of proof that they apply to anything that has to do with God

or Jesus, the Bible, or anything, is much higher than the standard of proof that they have

for any other piece of knowledge they have.

Look at evolution, which they are die-hard proponents of, cannot satisfy anything like the kind of proof

that they demand for God's existence.

In fact, on the merits, the evidence is so what I'm trying to think of the best

word without being, you know, it's just, it's so the paucity of evidence. It's so shallow for

Darwinian evolution. The evidence against it are so, the arguments against it are so strong.

How could anybody hold this view?

I won't get into the details now, but every single precise piece of mysterious stuff in the human body,

every single one has to be accounted for

through our Darwinian method on Darwinian fundamentalism.

It's just ludicrous.

...