What is Sunakism?
Coffee House Shots
The Spectator
4.4 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 21 September 2023
⏱️ 11 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Katy Balls speaks to Fraser Nelson and Rupert Darwall, a senior fellow at RealClearFoundation.
Become a Spectator subscriber today to access this podcast without adverts. Go to spectator.co.uk/adfree to find out more.
For more Spectator podcasts, go to spectator.co.uk/podcasts.
Contact us: podcast@spectator.co.uk
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Drax is the largest provider of renewable electricity in the UK and plays a critical role in ensuring |
| 0:05.4 | a secure energy system. The company has plans to invest billions in new infrastructure, |
| 0:09.9 | such as bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, which will create thousands of jobs whilst |
| 0:14.8 | also delivering the energy needed by homes and businesses up and down the UK. Discover more |
| 0:20.2 | at Drax.com. |
| 0:26.2 | Hello and welcome to Coffee House Shots' Spectators' daily politics podcast. I'm Katie Balls, |
| 0:31.0 | and I'm joined by Fraser Nelson and Richard Darwell, the author of Green tyranny and senior |
| 0:36.3 | fellow of the Real Clear Foundation in Washington. It's fair to say there was some panic |
| 0:40.4 | both in the Tory party and beyond ahead of Rishie's next speech yesterday. The BBC's leak |
| 0:46.0 | sat the cat amongst the pigeons, and Tory MPs started to worry about what the Prime Minister might |
| 0:51.9 | say. In the end, Rishie's had confirmed reports that he was planning to push back the ban on |
| 0:57.7 | petrol vehicles until 2035, so that's a five-year delay, and also to ease the ambition when it comes |
| 1:03.9 | to phasing out boilers. Fraser, what struck you most from the speech? It wasn't so much the headline |
| 1:10.6 | announcements. I mean, to align Britain to a 2035 deadline for phasing out new petrol cars, |
| 1:16.3 | as opposed to a 2031 that Boris Johnson made up from the top of his head, isn't that damaging? |
| 1:22.4 | Isn't that significant? Everybody knew that 2030 deadline was a joke. We simply don't have |
| 1:26.5 | a charging apparatus to support a country where the government's going to ban people from buying |
| 1:32.2 | new petrol-based cars. It would have been difficult in most of England, let alone in |
| 1:37.3 | the Scottish Highlands, where I'm from. So, I'm then satisfied with the fact that by 2030, |
| 1:42.8 | China's electric cars will be a lot cheaper than ours, so we would risk pretty much |
| 1:48.8 | decimating a good chunk of our own industry and handing it over to heavily subsidised |
| 1:54.8 | Chinese imports. 2030 was never going to work, and this was simply reality adjusting, |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

