Giant fans are enamored with the number one overall pick.

If they get the number one overall pick, the thought is, as you said, they could draft whoever the heck they want. But the likeliest outcome is that they would trade the number one overall pick. Let's go to Kevin in Manhattan. What's up, Kevin? Hey, fellas. Appreciate you having me on. Right before the holiday. With you all, a blessed holiday. Appreciate you. Thank you. Thank you. Congrats.

Congrats to a hot take Tommy the uh rodney

danger field of WFAN this uh no respect but as you uh as you alluded to earlier consensus

is the Giants needs players to sell multiple holes uh more draft picks is you know more

of uh tiki's favorite rookies so what i wanted to ask is what has more value because

potentially you know you could trade dart for for players that are proven he's a somewhat

proven player you could hire you know you could trade him for somewhat proven players.

You know, if you trade the draft pick, you're likely to get more draft picks rather than, you know, proven players.

So I just want to get your thoughts on what's more valuable from a trade capital perspective and will the Giants entertain both?

I think they probably would, but I think this is the challenge with the cap situation

that Giants find themselves in.

They don't have a ton of cap space going into the 20-26 season.

Now, the cap, as I've always said, is fungible. And so there are ways around it to create space.

But they're not going in like the Jets with $100 plus million in cap space.

So, yes, you can draft guys.

Or if you're the Jets, you can also go crazy in free agency.

Right.

So I don't think the Jets will do that, by the way. But if the Giants had cap space, free agency. Right. So I don't think the Jets will do that, by the way.

But if the Giants had cap space, free agency would be the way to think about filling some of those holes.

Because with rookies, it just extends that ability to get good right away.

They're also a lot cheaper, though.

...