Pastor John, in its most basic form, how do you define biblical in erency?

Before I go to the definition of inerency, let me give you the soil or the roots of why

would you even ask that question, the 66 books of the Christian canon is what I'm talking

about when I say scripture or Bible. They are, we believe, inspired by God, 2 Timothy 3

16, or to say it another way, 2 Peter 1, 21, no prophecy was ever produced by the will

of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit. So the reason

inerency rises because we claim this book is the very word of God. The center of God's

revelation is Jesus, and he's called the word of God incarnate. And he said scripture

cannot be broken. He said until heaven and earth pass away, not in the outing, not a dot,

little esteemed dot in the outing, will pass away from the law until all is accomplished.

So the word of God validates the word of God written, the word of God incarnate validates

the word of God written in the Old Testament. And then he commissioned apostles to speak

his word as the foundation of the church. And he promised when the spirit of truth comes,

truth, spirit of truth comes, he'll guide you into all truth. So Jesus stands at the

center as the word of God incarnate. And looking back, he validates the word of God written

and looking forward. He validates the word of God written and the apostles took it that

way because they said amazing things about their authority. Paul said, for example, in

1 Corinthians 14, 37, if anyone thinks that he's a prophet or spiritual, he should acknowledge

the things I am writing to you are a command of the Lord. If anyone does not recognize this,

he is not recognized. That's incredible. And the only reason he has the right to say that

is because he said, we are teaching in words spoken, not from men, but from the Holy Spirit

because Jesus promised I'm going to guide my apostles into all truth. So there's the reason

...