I look at the Purdue team.

I'm gonna take this in two spots.

Purdue I thought maybe could be that first Big Ten team

to win a title in 24 years.

They weren't. I thought Eddiedy was going to be that difference maker. He was, but he wasn't. They, as you said, I like how you put that. We're going to let him eat. We're shutting the water off on everybody else.

You will be out there on your own.

And that's literally what it was.

80 finishes were 37 points, I think.

But it wasn't enough because his team did not help him out everybody who contributed

throughout the entire year I guess I'm trying to think that I don't even know if Fletcher

lawyer even scored a point in that

it was pretty bad when you look at what Purdue did they had a formula

Matt painters probably gonna roll it back out there I saw they got enough

with a seven foot kid seven two they're waiting on him he's

gonna be the next I'm just assuming because they they've had a seven foot guy I

think going back to 2012 they haven't missed the beat. If you're Purdue you're going to be the best team in the big 10 next year.

Eyes are on favorite to win the conference. But looking at the bigger picture, Heller, what's the big 10 have to do?

24 years, I mean, I didn't know, I didn't realize that when I was at the title game in 2000,

I would be watching the last time that they made the title game.

I think this is like either the seventh or eighth time

they made the title game, but they've lost.

What does the big ten have to do to break through that threshold?

...