meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Coffee House Shots

What could surface from a Covid inquiry?

Coffee House Shots

The Spectator

News, Politics, Government, Daily News

4.42.1K Ratings

🗓️ 12 May 2021

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Boris Johnson has announced that an inquiry into the government's Covid response will be launched next year. Katy Balls talks to James Forsyth and Fraser Nelson about what could surface and whether it will shed any light.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This podcast is sponsored by Canacord Genuity Wealth Management, award-winning wealth managers who go above and beyond to support and guide you.

0:09.3

Visit can-dowealth.com to start building your wealth with confidence.

0:16.5

Hello and welcome to Coffee House shops. This is a spectator's daily politics podcast. I'm Katie Balls and I'm joined by James Lecifhe and Fraser Nelson. And we have the confirmation today from the Prime Minister that a public COVID inquiry is coming. James, give us the details.

0:33.2

So it won't start until next year. Boris Johnson's argument for why that is the case is that

0:39.2

he thinks that there's a risk of a resurgence this winter and that preparing for this inquiry

0:44.2

is going to take up a considerable portion of people's time like Chris Whitty or Patrick

0:48.9

Balance or people on the SAGE committee and obviously he didn't say this but obviously people

0:53.2

like him as well and he wanted

0:54.9

to wait until you were through the winter before you got there. I mean given how long public inquiries

0:59.9

take this means it's highly unlikely that this inquiry will report before the next election.

1:05.8

Indeed looking at how long some public inquiries have taken. I don't mean it's even certainly

1:09.0

will report before the election after next and we don't yet know who is going to head it. I mean, one of the big questions,

1:15.6

which will tell us about what kind of inquiry is going to be, is it headed by a judge, in which

1:21.6

case it will be a kind of classic, slightly prosecutorial inquiry, or is it headed by a public health professional who would

1:30.3

have a, I think, a slightly different approach? And then I think the other big question is,

1:34.5

the terms of reference of the inquiry, which we don't yet, no yet. Does it look at not only

1:39.5

how did the UK handle this pandemic, but how well prepared it was for that, for this pandemic?

1:43.9

Because that might cause some of the government's actions in a very different light, or is it specifically

1:50.0

on how the government handled this crisis? I think there is an element, as Robert Peston wrote

1:53.9

on Coffee House here, of the government trying to get out ahead of Dominic Cummings' appearance

1:59.3

for the health and science technology select committee

2:01.7

or conducting a kind of their own kind of mini-inquiry into it.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Spectator, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Spectator and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.