meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Were Trump's Judicial Appointments Worth It?

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 25 February 2021

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Some in the conservative legal movement view Trump's (and Mitch McConnell's) success at confirming judges as simply not worth the rest of the Trump presidency. Billy Easley, a senior policy advisor at Americans for Prosperity, is one of them. His new Libertarianism.org essay is entitled, “The Myth of Trump’s Judicial Success."

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Kator Daily Podcast for Thursday, February 25th, 2021.

0:07.7

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:08.7

The Trump presidency, along with a Republican Senate, brought with it a dramatic increase in judicial appointments.

0:15.7

But last year, Donald Trump lost the White House and Republicans lost the Senate.

0:19.8

So what is the state of the conservative legal movement after the Trump presidency?

0:24.6

Billy Eesley is a senior policy advisor at Americans for Prosperity.

0:28.8

We discussed his new essay at Libertarianism.org, the myth of Trump's judicial success.

0:36.0

What was the upside of the Trump administration with respect to judges.

0:44.0

The numbers, I mean the sheer numbers of how many people who are principled conservative

0:51.0

activists who may we managed to get through the Senate.

0:54.5

Over 200 nominees were confirmed.

0:59.2

We had 54 appellate nominees confirmed,

1:02.1

and we had three Supreme Court justices who are going to

1:06.3

change the entire way that the judicial philosophy on the court will be for a generation.

1:12.6

And so when you say we, you mean the conservative legal movement,

1:16.6

not to be confused with people who call themselves conservatives.

1:20.6

Yeah, actually I think that's a sort of fascinating sort of point to note here.

1:25.0

And I think it's actually broader than what people consider it to be, right?

1:30.0

I think when people say a conservative legal movement, they tend to only think about

1:33.8

about federal society, right?

1:35.1

The people in DC coming up with the names and lists of people

1:39.1

who should be appointed, right?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.