Welcome to the AM Update, week in review. A collection of the best moments from Aaron McIntyre's

morning update. This is from Robert Malone's substack, Malone. News. On March 21st, 2025, the Science

of Climate Change Journal published a groundbreaking study using AI, specifically GROC 3, to debunk the man-made

climate crisis narrative. The peer-reviewed study and literature review not only reassesses man's

role in the climate change narrative, it also reveals a general trend to exaggerate global warming. Surprise,

surprise. Furthermore, this paper demonstrates that using AI to critically review scientific data

will soon become the standard in both the physical and medical sciences. After the debacle of

man-made climate change and corruption of evidence-based medicine by Big Farmer, the use of AI in government-funded research

will become normalized and standards will be developed for its use in peer-reviewed journal.

So what does this AI-created study, AI-created but peer-reviewed study say?

Published in the Science of Climate Change, the paper,

a critical reassessment of anthropogenic CO2 global warming hypothesis,

suggests natural forces like solar activity and temperature cycles are the real culprits.

It uses unadjusted records to argue human CO2,

only 4% of the annual carbon cycle, vanishes into

oceans and forests within three to four years, not centuries, as the intergovernmental

panel on climate change claims, during the 2020 COVID lockdowns, a 7% emissions drop,

that's 2.4 billion tons of CO2, should have caused a noticeable dip in the

monoloa CO2 curve. Yet no blip appeared. The paper says hinting nature's dominance. So that is very

interesting. Something, I think we might have talked about this at the time. We, meaning corporately

on the right, might have talked about this at the time, that the

lockdowns might be a poison pill for the global warming agenda.

...