meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Daily

Wednesday, March 22, 2017

The Daily

The New York Times

Daily News, News

4.3107.6K Ratings

🗓️ 22 March 2017

⏱️ 19 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

On the second day of the confirmation hearings for Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, senators want to know about his independence from the man who nominated him. Guests: Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times; Cynthia Orr, the plaintiff in an important case that Judge Gorsuch decided. For more information on today’s episode, visit http://nyti.ms/2nrXHsE.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

From the New York Times, I'm Michael Barbaro. This is the Daily.

0:08.0

Today, day two of Judge Neil Gorsuch's Supreme Court confirmation hearings.

0:14.0

Senators question, who does Gorsuch work for? The President, corporations, or regular Americans?

0:21.0

And, as Democrats attack Gorsuch as an enemy of regular Americans,

0:26.0

a case that he says proves they're wrong. It's Wednesday, March 22.

0:33.0

So, let's start with my first question. I'd like to have you describe in any way you want to,

0:41.0

what judicial independence means, and specifically tell us whether you'd have any trouble ruling against a president who appointed you.

0:52.0

That's a softball, Mr. Chairman. I'm sorry. So, that's a softball, Mr. Chairman.

0:59.0

I have no difficulty ruling against or for any party, other than based on what the law and the facts in the particular case require.

1:09.0

From the very beginning of his confirmation hearing on Tuesday morning, Judge Neil Gorsuch was fielding questions about independence.

1:16.0

Questions from the left and from the right, starting with independence from the man who nominated him.

1:22.0

I really want to congratulate the president to pick you quite frankly. I was worried about who he'd pick. Maybe somebody on TV.

1:33.0

For Democrats, the question of independence went further. Judge Gorsuch would replace the league conservative Justice Anthony Scalia.

1:40.0

Scalia was known to vote for businesses when their interests clashed with those other workers.

1:45.0

Gives you a short list, led better versus good year tire, which limited the ability of women to seek equal pay.

1:53.0

Gross VFBL financial services, which made it more difficult to prove age discrimination.

2:00.0

The University of Southwest Texas.

2:02.0

Senator Diane Feinsign began with what would be a focus of Democrats all day, independence from corporate interests.

2:08.0

Each of these cases was five to four and Justice Scalia voted with the majority against the employee in every case.

2:16.0

President Trump and others have said you are the next Scalia.

2:21.0

How do we have confidence in you that you won't just be for the big corporations?

2:29.0

Adam, what was Senator Feinsign getting at with that question?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The New York Times, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The New York Times and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.