meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Briefing with Albert Mohler

Wednesday, December 3, 2025

The Briefing with Albert Mohler

The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

Jesus, God, Culture, Albert, Sbts, Truth, 881944, Seminary, Bible, Mohler, Religion & Spirituality, Preach, Commentary, Christ, Scripture, Christianity

4.88.4K Ratings

🗓️ 3 December 2025

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This is The Briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.
On today’s edition of The Briefing, Dr. Mohler discusses oral arguments at SCOTUS on an Orwellian subpoena directed at a crisis pregnancy center in New Jersey, conservative birth rates, and reading and evaluating arguments closely–like the big difference between “not totally true” and “totally not true.”
Part I (00:12 – 10:38)
An Orwellian Subpoena from New Jersey Goes to SCOTUS: SCOTUS Hears Oral Argument Over Crisis Pregnancy Center in New Jersey – This is Big
Part II (10:38 – 21:52)
Are We Looking at a Conservative Birth Rate? New Reports Show That Future Generations Might Belong to Conservatives
Part III (21:52 – 27:05)
Is a Woman’s ‘Fertility Cliff’ of 35 Not Totally True or Totally Not True? – We Need to Pay Close Attention to How Language Works
Sign up to receive The Briefing in your inbox every weekday morning.
Follow Dr. Mohler:
X | Instagram | Facebook | YouTube
For more information on The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, go to sbts.edu.
For more information on Boyce College, just go to BoyceCollege.com.
To write Dr. Mohler or submit a question for The Mailbox, go here.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

It's Wednesday, December 3rd, 2025.

0:07.0

I'm Albert Moller, and this is the briefing, a daily analysis of news and events from a Christian worldview.

0:13.0

Very big case argued yesterday before the Supreme Court of the United States,

0:17.0

a case in which there is so much at stake, and especially for Christians,

0:22.3

and frankly, for conservative organizations, or for that matter, just about any nonprofit

0:27.3

organization that might be on the wrong side of any state attorney general. Okay, so here's what

0:32.4

happened. Here's why the case appeared yesterday at the Supreme Court. It is because back in November of 2023,

0:39.9

New Jersey's Attorney General, Matthew Plotkin, issued a hostile subpoena against an organization

0:46.8

known as the First Choice Women's Resource Center. The best way to put that is it is a pro-life

0:51.0

pregnancy center. And we understand what's at stake here. In the subpoena

0:56.2

issued by the Attorney General, there was the demand that First Choice would give the court

1:01.9

and give the prosecutor, in this case the Attorney General, 10 years worth of documents,

1:06.6

including its own statements on abortion pill reversal, information it provided to clients and donors,

1:12.0

documents identifying personnel,

1:13.8

copies of every first choice solicitation and advertisement,

1:16.8

and information related to outside organizations

1:19.3

that first choice works with.

1:22.4

There was also a demand for information related to donors.

1:25.4

So you look at all of this and you recognize

1:27.4

this is

1:28.2

really big. This is a horrible precedent. Here you have a state attorney general issuing a subpoena

1:34.7

and requesting, indeed it's a subpoena. So it's not a request. It is a demand, a legally binding

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of The Southern Baptist Theological Seminary and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.