It's nothing for an attack on women's basic human rights and civil rights.

And it's something that women of America are going to have to fight again with everything

they've got.

They want to challenge Rovers' way, but my humble view is that this is not the case.

We want to bring to the Supreme Court because I think this will lose.

So that was Senator Kirsten Gillibrand doing the same thing, all the Democratic presidential

candidates said yesterday about the war on women and all that sort of stuff.

And then Pat Robertson, who's on the other side, he's a televanjalist.

He's on the other side who has problems with Rovers' way, but doesn't think this is the

way to go about it.

Right.

Although I think he's missing a key point or two, and David French, senior writer for National

Reviews, senior fellow at the National Review Institute, has written an absolutely terrific

and thought-provoking piece about what Alabama and Georgia are trying to do, and David

French joins us now.

David, how are you?

I'm good.

Thanks for having me.

It's our pleasure.

Really enjoyed your reasoning in the article.

How do we lay out for the folks?

The legislature's in Alabama and Georgia understand this law will not take effect anytime

...