We're Big, Comfortable & Dumb
Armstrong & Getty On Demand
iHeartPodcasts
4.6 • 3.5K Ratings
🗓️ 17 January 2025
⏱️ 36 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Hour 2 of A&G features...
- The Supreme Court weighs in on TikTok ban
- How do music tastes develop?
- More on the TikTok ban
- Non binary MA city councilor takes a month off after being misgendered
Stupid Should Hurt: https://www.armstrongandgetty.com/
See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio at the George Washington Broadcast Center. |
| 0:07.8 | Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty. |
| 0:10.1 | Armstrong and Getty. |
| 0:11.6 | And now here's Armstrong and Getty. |
| 0:23.5 | At 100202, East Coast time, we have a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court on the popular app known as TikTok. |
| 0:31.3 | The Supreme Court upholds the law that was passed by Congress in a bipartisan manner signed in the law by Joe Biden last April |
| 0:40.4 | to find a new buyer within 270 days. The Supreme Court has now ruled that that law stands. |
| 0:49.1 | What happens to the app, however, is a wide open question. |
| 0:52.8 | So this is just happening now, and we were planning |
| 0:55.7 | to talk about TikTok anyway. What does this mean, Joe? Well, as always, I want to point out, |
| 1:01.9 | it's a ban on the Chinese ownership of the social media app because they are a hostile power. |
| 1:11.1 | That's what the law says. |
| 1:12.5 | Supreme Court upheld the ban, quote, |
| 1:14.4 | there is no doubt that TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, |
| 1:18.3 | means of engagement, and source of community. |
| 1:19.9 | But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns |
| 1:26.1 | regarding TikTok's data collection |
| 1:27.9 | practices in relationship with a foreign adversary. |
| 1:30.9 | For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the challenge provisions do not violate |
| 1:34.6 | petitioner's First Amendment rights. |
| 1:37.0 | Justice Sotomayor has an opinion concurring in part. |
| 1:41.0 | She thinks it does touch on the First Amendment. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from iHeartPodcasts, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of iHeartPodcasts and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

