meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

Was Someone Else Supposed To Be at Moselle the Night Maggie and Paul Were Killed?

Hidden Killers With Tony Brueski | True Crime News & Commentary

True Crime Today

News, True Crime, News Commentary

3.3907 Ratings

🗓️ 19 May 2026

⏱️ 16 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Jim Griffin said “third parties and potential motives” on national television. Dick Harpootlian said the reversal gives them subpoena power. Both said people have come forward with information since the 2023 trial. Neither would say another word.

Tony Brueski and Robin Dreeke unpack the listener question underneath the defense’s cryptic statements: Was the plan always for someone else to be at Moselle that night? The evidence has always raised this question quietly. Two weapons. Two types of ammunition. No firearms recovered. A defendant who three months later proved he delegates violence when he allegedly recruited Curtis Eddie Smith for the roadside insurance scheme.

Robin analyzes the behavioral pattern of a person who plans through intermediaries. Alex didn’t swing the bat himself in any of his financial schemes—he always had someone else do the part that created legal exposure. The question is whether that pattern extended to June 7, 2021, and if it did, what went wrong.

But Robin also challenges the theory directly. If genuine third-party evidence exists, there’s a vast difference between teasing it on morning shows and presenting it in court. Tony and Robin dissect whether these public hints are a legal preview or a narrative play.

Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/

Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1

Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/

Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod

X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePod

This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.

#AlexMurdaugh #MurdaughRetrial #MurdaughMurders #ThirdParty #TrueCrime #MurdaughTrial #HiddenKillers #SouthCarolina #CriminalJustice #MurdaughCase

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is Hidden Killers Live with Tony Brewski and Robin Drey.

0:07.5

New trial for Alec Murdoi, it's likely going to be happening.

0:10.4

No date or anything set yet.

0:11.9

I don't know people are like, well, what if the state decides they don't want to?

0:15.0

Well, the state's already said publicly,

0:16.7

and everyone running for the position has all publicly said,

0:20.1

they're going to be trying

0:21.6

Alec Murdo again so unless an asteroid hits or something who knows I guess anything is possible

0:27.9

we're likely going to be seeing another trial of Alec Murdoe the only thing I think that would be

0:32.8

preventing that would be death so unless Alec kicks it between now and then, we're likely going to see

0:38.9

another Alec Murdoch trial. That'd be something, wouldn't it? Yeah, I mean, again, anything's possible.

0:43.7

The question is, what's going to be, what's going to be happening in a new trial? Will there be

0:50.9

third party defense arguments being made?

0:56.4

That's already been hinted at a bit by the attorneys for Alec Murdo.

1:02.3

They were on television the day after the conviction was overturned and said that they have new information about third parties and potential motives, things that were not in existence

1:13.6

in trial number one. If we go down the third party road, who are we talking about and why, I guess,

1:21.6

would be the question. Your thoughts in the comment section as we work through this, I'd love to get your reactions if you think we're going to see a third-party argument made here,

1:32.9

meaning somebody else did this other than Alec.

1:36.8

I'd be very curious for everybody's opinion on where that is, in fact, going to land.

1:44.2

One of the things that I know Blanca Simpson had said

1:48.9

that essentially she thought there was a plan A and a plan B that night,

1:55.4

plan A might have been that there was somebody else possibly involved in this.

...

Transcript will be available on the free plan in 9 days. Upgrade to see the full transcript now.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from True Crime Today, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of True Crime Today and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.