the most online-brained part of the manifesto that I've heard in a million different ways from

others who did not kill CEOs. Again, this is non-ideological. This is across the political

spectrum. Obviously, the problem is more complex, but I do not have space. And frankly,

I do not pretend to be the most qualified person to lay out the full argument.

It is not an issue of awareness at this point, but clearly power games at play.

Evidently, I am the first to face it with such brutal honesty. many people I've talked to who work in Silicon Valley who were like I came into work today and I was looking around at the desk and being like that guy that guy that guy are all Luigi Manjione

I'm John Favro I'm Max Fisher Max welcome back thank you we lots to cover. There's so much going on in the offline world.

So much.

Maybe another friend of the pot out there.

Taking it a little far.

Think hard about that offline challenge.

Unrequited.

Yeah, that's right.

It should be clear.

It's an unrequited friendship of the pot.

So, before we get to that, last week, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected TikTok's attempt to overturn a law banning the Chinese own platform from the app stores unless the company finds a new owner.

This ruling means that unless TikTok is granted an emergency motion to pause the law and hope that either the Supreme Court takes up its case, the incoming Trump administration decides not to enforce the man or the incoming Republican Congress repeals the ban.

The popular video app is currently scheduled to face a nationwide ban beginning on January 19th of 2025.

So TikTok challenged the law on First Amendment grounds, arguing that a potential ban would deny

Americans' access to TikTok as a venue for public expression.

They also attempted to dispute the law's claim that TikTok was a national security risk.

The D.C. Circuit did not by either argument, with a three-judge panel ruling unanimously

...