Oh, and welcome back to Sociology 101.

Today, hopefully we're not going to be too long.

You know how that goes with sometimes when we plan one thing, we'll end up going

a whole other direction.

But my plan today is just to respond to a tweet that was just put out yesterday by James White

regarding Clement of Rome.

Now, we've done some back and forth and days gone past about early church fathers and some of the writings and all those kinds of things.

But I'm going to try to limit our discussion to this particular tweet

and kind of just cover the fallacy inherent within these kinds of tweets.

In my estimation, James White reads the Bible a lot like he reads,

Clement of Rome, with the preconceived kind of downloaded concept of

election being God's unilateral decision to save certain people before they're ever born.

Anytime he sees the word elect, he just downloads that information into that word and

therefore Isojit's Clement, much like he isogeets Paul.

Now that's my claim. Obviously, he might, you know, make the same accusation towards us as

provisionist that we somehow, you know, are exegeting or isogeeding our belief in God's love

and provision for all people into the text. Heaven forbid we do that. But nevertheless, we want to look at this in its context and also see all of Klemich's

writings in order to understand them rightly.

Before we jump into this, let me remind you as what is scrolling on the bottom of the

screen to download the app, give a five-star rating if you haven't already, to like and subscribe,

click that bell. And if you're looking for a higher theological education, consider Trinity

Sim. If you want to support us, click on that support link. We would love to have all the support

...