4.8 • 4.7K Ratings
🗓️ 17 February 2023
⏱️ 9 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
These bitesize episodes focus on the greatest lessons we’ve learnt from the guests we've had on the podcast.
Today, Jake reflects back on episode 106, an insightful conversation with football referee Anthony Taylor. In this episode Anthony was given the opportunity to share why he made certain decisions on the pitch. Jake discusses how this episode helped him to reframe criticising others and centre empathy, asking the question: how can we judge someone if we don’t understand them?
This bitesize clip explores why we should focus on kindness and keep looking for the green lights.
Listen to the full episode - https://pod.fo/e/10f664
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hi there, you're listening to a bike size episode of High Performance. Look, we know that you can't always spare |
0:05.6 | 60 or 90 minutes or sometimes even two hours to sit and listen to the enlightening in-depth, |
0:11.9 | but long conversations that we have on this podcast. And so if that's you, then this is the |
0:17.0 | episode for you. Every single Friday, we share some learnings from a guest who's joined us previously |
0:21.6 | on High Performance. We share it, and then I'll talk about it at the back end. So let's get straight |
0:26.4 | to it then. This is when we were joined by football referee Anthony Taylor, who gave us the kind |
0:31.6 | of insight that we don't normally get into the world of the referee, and I think the most important |
0:36.4 | thing for us all to do in an episode like this is to suspend our opinion and put empathy at the |
0:42.8 | centre of our thoughts. Here's a small taste of when Anthony Taylor joined us on High Performance. |
0:50.1 | You make an incorrect decision on the field because you're you position this wrong, right? |
0:55.2 | That your angle and your views not as good as it could be. So there's a really good example from a |
1:02.0 | few years ago at Swansea where I gave a penalty for Hamburg, and it was actually Hamburg by the attacker, |
1:10.0 | but because in that particular moment, I lost concentration, I was lazy. I've got totally the wrong |
1:17.3 | position. The angle that you're looking at is it just makes it look like the defender Hamburg. |
1:24.1 | Now people listening to that will go, well that's just a ridiculous way of explaining it and how can |
1:29.0 | you not say that the Hamburg is by the attacker? Well my challenge to anybody who thinks that is |
1:37.8 | to truly understand the process you've got to go through, give it a go because it would even happen |
1:44.0 | in junior football. You will sometimes totally misjudge something in a split second. And so that |
1:50.5 | that example at Swansea was down to laziness and poor positioning, pure and simple. |
1:57.3 | And how does the scrutiny process work after the game? Because I think this is |
2:02.0 | something that also leads towards the resilience you have to have to do your job. I mean you literally |
2:07.8 | have someone give you a mark, right, and tell you how well you've done on that day. We have two |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from High Performance, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of High Performance and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.