Hello there, I'm David Hiscay and on my podcast, The Brain Food Show,

our team, including the great Simon Whistler, our own devices, Jill Messier,

and fact fiends Carl Smallwood, serve up fascinating facts and stories that'll blow your mind.

From ancient mysteries to scientific curiosities to deep dive history,

we deliver knowledge that will help you become the star of water cooler talk the world over.

Listen to the Brain Food Show wherever you get your podcasts.

Welcome to Women in Crime, Reconsidered, where we're revisiting our catalog and bringing new insights and updates to our old cases.

Today's episode is number 13, Amanda Lewis.

Amanda Lewis came across my radar as a listener suggestion.

God, it's hard to remember because some of these are so long ago.

It's one of my favorite cases. I remember that one very well.

I know, yeah. We've talked about it since. I was totally intrigued about this one.

And I think one of the reasons you connected with it because it involved some questionable eyewitness testimony, which was really the major piece of evidence in a case that many believe is a no-crime wrongful conviction.

I cannot wait to hear the update on this.

Okay. At the end of the original episode, you questioned whether or not the eyewitness changed his mind or came to a different conclusion years later, and after today's

episode, I'll have an answer for you. But first, let's hear our original coverage of the Amanda

Lewis story. On August 8, 2007, 7-year-old Adriana Hutto drowned in her pool in what seemed like

a clear accidental drowning, not in common in Florida,

but a surprise witness would quickly come forward and accuse Adriana's mother of her murder.

So is this a case of an accident or was this a murder?

This is episode 13, the Amanda Lewis story. Hey Amy, it's really good to see you today, even if it's just on Zoom.

I prefer to see you in person, but I'll settle for this to keep everyone healthy.

...