YouTube has gone through a series of controversies over the past several years resulting in many different ad-pocalypsees,

a word that describes when advertisers pull off the YouTube platform and every creator gets hurt.

It doesn't matter what kind of content you make.

If Pepsi, for instance, says they don't want to advertise on YouTube,

then people who make video game content will see less ads from Pepsi and they will lose money.

For the past week or so are several days.

Carlos Mazza of Vox has been targeting Stephen Crowder because Stephen Crowder has said

mean things about him. Now, the left will call this harassment, but I don't think that's apt in that

harassment requires certain, well, it will look, it's semantics, right?

They're going to say harassment because it benefits their argument that calls us somehow a victim

instead of saying mean things, which is basically what Stephen Crowder did.

Stephen Crowder was mocking Carlos Mazza as a comedian while he rebutted many of the ideas that

Carlos Mazza has put forth on his massive platform. But something interesting has happened.

And the reason why I bring up the ad-pocalypse is that interestingly, there's been a kind of shift

in the rhetoric pushed by Carlos Mazza as he appeared on Buzzfeed news, I believe this morning,

just this morning. And now he's talking about advertisers. He's not, he said Stephen Crowder isn't

necessarily the problem. It's that YouTube is going to be distracting advertisers by claiming to

be for pride so that the advertisers don't realize their content appears on homophobic content, etc.

There's a big concern, a fear now that Carlos Mazza for some reason isn't worried about the

harassment he's receiving. He's worried about advertisers putting their sponsorship on certain content.

That could potentially trigger an ad-pocalypse and negatively impact all creators. Now,

I don't want to plant any conspiracy theories that Carlos is doing this on purpose to benefit

...