Hey folks, Preet here. Joyce Vance and I are out with a new episode of The Insider Podcast,

and we're sharing an excerpt with listeners of Stay Tuned.

This week, we're joined by our friend, constitutional law scholar, and one of the sharpest observers of the Supreme Court, Steve Vladick.

We cover an election case involving a basic question with major implications for how votes are counted,

specifically whether ballots must be mailed and received by Election Day.

Then we preview next week's oral arguments in a case that could do away with birthright citizenship.

If you're a cafe insider, you can hear the full conversation now in the insider feed.

And if you're not yet a member,

we hope you'll join our community of reasonable people

living in unreasonable times.

Insiders help support our work

and get access to complete episodes

and other subscriber benefits.

Head to cafe.com slash insider

or stay tuned.substack.com.

Now, on to the show.

You know, Steve, I had been waiting for the oral argument in Watson versus RNC, the late

arrived mail-in ballot counting case from Mississippi, really since the start of the term. And I was stunned, I have to say

stunned, to hear that within about two minutes of the Solicitor General of Mississippi, Scott

Stewart, beginning to speak with the justices, that it sounded like they were more concerned

about what conservatives

called ballot harvesting than they were about mail-in ballots per se. So what did you make of

...