meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Slate Daily Feed

Voting Rights, But Mainly for White People

Slate Daily Feed

Slate

Business, News, Society & Culture

3.91.1K Ratings

🗓️ 18 October 2025

⏱️ 57 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Janai Nelson, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund argued in defense of the Voting Rights Act in the pivotal Supreme Court case,  Louisiana v Callais this week. Nelson joins Dahlia Lithwick on this episode of Amicus to probe the implications of the case for voting rights around the country, and the role of the Supreme Court in a democratic system. Nelson warns that while the consequences of losing Section 2 would be catastrophic, t many Americans are unaware how much of their democracy is undergirded by the rights accorded in the 14th and 15th amendments, and effectuated by the Voting Rights Act. Their conversation delves into the historical context of voting rights, the importance of precedent, and the unfinished, but essential, struggle for racial justice in America.


Want more Amicus? Join Slate Plus to unlock weekly bonus episodes with exclusive legal analysis. Plus, you’ll access ad-free listening across all your favorite Slate podcasts. You can subscribe directly from the Amicus show page on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Or, visit slate.com/amicusplus to get access wherever you listen.

Need to set up your Slate Plus feed? If you subscribed through Slate.com, check out our FAQ at slate.com/podcastfaqs for easy instructions. Members subscribed via Apple Podcasts get automatic access—no setup required.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi, this is Ava from Vanta.

0:02.0

In today's digital world, compliance regulations are changing constantly,

0:07.0

and earning customer trust has never mattered more.

0:10.0

Vanta helps companies get compliant fast and stay secure,

0:13.0

with the most advanced AI automation and continuous monitoring out there.

0:17.0

So whether you're a startup going for your first SOC 2 or ISO-27,001, or a growing enterprise managing vendor risk, Banta makes it quick, easy and scalable. And I'm not to say that because I work here. Get started today at banta.com. If I get my kid a phone, I'll be able to keep in touch with them all the time. They'll be on it all the time. Could walk to school by himself. She could see something she shouldn't. He could chat with grandma. Friends, trolls. They can access anything on the internet. They can access anything on the internet. So, should I give my kid a phone? Growing up with phones isn't always easy. Introducing EEE Safer Sims. Sims that help moderate usage and shield harmful content on any smartphone.

0:54.8

Choose EEC for Sims.

0:56.4

Only on the UK's best network.

0:58.2

To verify best network see e.e.com.uker claims.

1:05.6

This is Amicus Slate's podcast about the courts and the law and the Supreme Court.

1:11.2

I'm Dahlia Let'sway.

1:13.1

The Voting Rights Act is the birth certificate of our democracy.

1:23.8

Louisiana v. Kelle is probably the most important case of the term and surely the most important variable concerning the future of multiracial democracy.

1:35.9

It's also one of those really thickety cases that dredges up decades of voting rights precedent, constitutional powers, swirling congressional maps,

1:46.6

and so very much law that it can be hard to comprehend the enormity of what is on the chopping

1:52.6

block in terms of the Voting Rights Act and almost equally hard to comprehend the ways in which

1:58.6

the Supreme Court charged with interpreting and enforcing the law as written and precedent as created, plans to eviscerate it.

2:07.8

Arguments in Kelle took place over almost three hours at SCOTUS on Wednesday, and while I doubt many tuned in for all of it, the stagecraft was such that you could be forgiven if you got

2:19.9

lost in the pretense that this was all a really hard and thorny new question. This is not a hard

2:26.4

and thorny new question. For all the obstruction and occlusion, something important may be about

2:33.2

to happen to the Voting Rights Act, and it is our

2:36.1

obligation to name it and to explain it and to lay out the stakes. To do that today, I'm joined by

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Slate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Slate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.