Yeah, absolutely.

Okay, but not aboriginal.

So what's the way to determine who is and isn't one?

Well, that's what I'm asking because, like,

well, you just said an infant isn't one,

so I mean, I'm asking what your criteria is.

Well, I guess, I guess maybe I misspoke.

I guess I don't know, like a human being,

I guess, like is a baby Aboriginal Australian, a human being? I don't know. I'm not going to

Well, what I'm asking is if it's an IQ question, then the baby doesn't make the cut. So a baby's

not there yet, right? Maybe even a two-year-old too right

Yeah, and that's that was what I said because I don't take the IQ thing like the IQ thing because that's what my friend said and I'm just like well that doesn't really make sense

Because like what if someone with Down syndrome you know what I mean?

So like what is what what does? Why does a

universal classification of a group that people necessitate that they're all going to have the same characteristics or manifestations?

Well, we're using people again, like these words that I personally reject, like...

On what basis, though? Okay, so there's no classes of things at all

well there are but like what's the justification for throwing say i don't know you in the same

category as an 58 iq aboriginal and and the iq thing yeah i thought IQ didn't matter now it does or what

no it doesn't you're right

I'll take that out but then but you agree with me there are categorizations and

classifications based on biology like say like I already said like a cat yeah but you're

...