Just as you've done, put it to a vote to the entire state.

Do you feel that has more validity than the process that took place in Texas that never was subjected to Texas voters?

Absolutely, Absolutely.

And I'll tell you why.

Our referendum process is a three-part process.

The General Assembly has to vote to move forward a potential amendment, a constitutional

amendment, and they have to vote twice on that, which they did.

We had majority votes on both votes.

And then it goes to the people.

And so the fact that we had to travel across the Commonwealth of Virginia, make our case to the people of Virginia, explain what this referendum in the middle of April actually is why it matters and why we're encouraging a yes vote.

That is a vote where the people of our Commonwealth had the ability to say, yes,

we want to take this step. We want to pass this referendum. And we want to do this redistricting

at this moment as a responsive and temporary step. Again, preserving our long-term bipartisan

redistricting commission, but recognizing the urgency. And so it wasn't a bunch of

legislators who were trying to do the president's bidding. It wasn't a bunch of legislators who were,

you know, choosing partisanship over anything else. This was the people of Virginia saying,

we have this option, and we are choosing to take it. Okay, so that is the Virginia governor, Abigail Spanberger, who ran on being a moderate.

I don't know why anyone believed that.

I even hear conservatives talking about how moderate she was going to be and so on, et cetera.

That's just not the case.

The Democrat Party, as I've said time and time again, they're not the same Democrat party. This is a Marxist party.

Barack Obama led the way. He laid the table. He set the foundation. And now you have all these

...