Utah v. Strieff

5-4

Prologue Projects

News Commentary, News, Government

4.6 • 3.2K Ratings

🗓️ 15 November 2022

⏱️ 44 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

The Fourth Amendment protects you from unreasonable search and seizure by the government. Unless the government wants to unreasonably search and/or seize. In that case, the Supreme Court says "go for it babes!"

If you're not a 5-4 Premium member, you're not hearing every episode! To get exclusive Premium-only episodes, discounts on merch, access to our Slack community, and more, join at fivefourpod.com/support.]

5 to 4 is presented by Prologue Projects. Rachel Ward is our producer. Leon Neyfakh and Andrew Parsons provide editorial support. Our production manager is Percia Verlin, and our assistant producer is Arlene Arevalo. Our website was designed by Peter Murphy. Our artwork is by Teddy Blanks at Chips NY, and our theme song is by Spatial Relations.

Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon) and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	We'll hear argument next in case 14, 13, 73, Utah vs. Strife.
0:10.0	Hey everyone, this is Leon from Piasco and Prologg Projects.
0:14.0	On this week's episode of 5-4, Peter, Rianne, and Michael are talking about Utah vs. Strife.
0:21.0	In this case, the defendant was stopped by police, who then found a warrant out for his arrest.
0:26.0	The police searched him, found drugs, and arrested him.
0:29.0	What's distressing about the case is that the initial stop of the defendant was unconstitutional,
0:34.0	according to both the lower court and the Supreme Court.
0:37.0	We do not hold that officer Fakrill's initial stop of Strife was constitutional.
0:43.0	Nor do we preclude Strife from seeking a different kind of legal remedy for the violation of his Fourth Amendment rights.
0:52.0	But the Supreme Court still ruled in favor of the police, saying that a quote, intravening event, discovery of the warrant, justified to stop.
1:01.0	The holding adds another weapon that the police can use in their arsenal against people's Fourth Amendment rights.
1:06.0	This is 5-4, a podcast about how much the Supreme Court sucks.
1:11.0	Welcome to 5-4, where we dissect and analyze the Supreme Court cases that have banned our civil rights,
1:21.0	like an Elon Musk parody being banned from Twitter.
1:24.0	I'm Peter, I'm here with Michael.
1:27.0	Hey everybody, and Rianne.
1:29.0	Hello.
1:30.0	That one's probably going to be out of date by the time that it airs.
1:32.0	Right now, we're in the midst of a wave of Elon Musk parodies being banned.
1:37.0	This time next week, I imagine Twitter will be but a crater in the ground.
1:42.0	Yeah, we're all about to get banned.
1:44.0	Did you see that?
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Prologue Projects, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Prologue Projects and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.