meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Cato Podcast

Understanding Income Mobility & Inequality

Cato Podcast

Cato Institute

Immigration, News, News Commentary, Peace, 424708, Markets, Government, Libertarian, Policy, Politics, Cato, Defense

4.5979 Ratings

🗓️ 2 March 2015

⏱️ 13 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Understanding the dynamics of income over time requires more than a few momentary snapshots. Economist Steve Horwitz explains. This interview was recorded at the International Students for Liberty Conference.

Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

This is the Cato Daily Podcast for Monday, March 2nd, 2015.

0:08.0

I'm Caleb Brown.

0:09.0

Much of what we know about contemporary income inequality masks the fact that incomes tend to go up as we

0:15.3

get older and gain experience and education.

0:18.8

Steve Horwitz is a professor of economics at St Lawrence University.

0:22.4

We spoke at the International Students for Liberty Conference

0:24.8

held last month.

0:27.1

As you understand it, what are the conventional narratives

0:30.2

about income mobility and income inequality in the United States?

0:35.0

Well, I think the easiest way to summarize it, of course, is the rich are getting rich and the

0:38.3

poorer getting poorer, and I think relatedly that the middle class is in decline and that middle class folks are living worse than they did a generation ago.

0:47.5

And so what all of that seems to suggest is that inequality is worsening.

0:51.5

Mobility is low or non-existent,

0:55.0

and that poor folks are perhaps worse off,

0:57.6

or at least poverty is a bigger problem

0:59.5

in some sense of the term than it used to be.

1:01.0

I think that's, all those things together constitute a conventional

1:04.0

narrative. Okay so what is missed by that or what is needs to be teased out?

1:10.0

Yeah, I think I think a few things. I think the rich are getting rich poor getting poorer story in particular

1:16.0

relies upon people looking at the quintiles you know each 20% of the income

1:20.2

distribution and and there is a piece of evidence there that people can

1:23.4

point to it's true the top 20% have a higher share of of national income than they

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Cato Institute, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Cato Institute and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.