After more careful analysis, we're led back to the conclusion that there were two shooters at the Trump rally.

Hello, everyone, Dr. Chris Martinson here with another Citizens Investigation episode. We've got a lot of people weighing in. Thank you everybody who sent us incredible analysis,

shared your expertise, and did everything you could to help us get to where we are at this point in time.

Particularly any more videos, anything like that.

We want the data. The audio data is the key to this at this point in time so that we can

resolve some things. And by the way, we're going to have to talk about this now. Remember,

just last time, well, we had another hypothesis for how it is that those first three shots could

have sounded so different from the other five.

So we had to entertain that.

After reanalyzing this right now, this hypothesis of two shooters.

This is back to the four right now as the best fit for the data we have.

So remember, we were thinking with the help from the people at Raven Geostrategic that look at those things indicated on the arrows there.

Those are side-mounted posts, you know, posts for aiming, right? Iron sights.

And because they're side-mounted, to use them on the side, you have to tip the gun over, so the gun's now laying like this,

and now the gases that eject out of that muzzle at the front and let me get my little red pointer thing out here this

muzzle at the front is going to throw the throw the gases hot gases and even the flames that you

would see from that muzzle flash it's going to throw them to the side so if you tipped it up the

thinking was maybe the sound was going up and down and it would sound totally different than if it was sideways. So maybe Crooks laid that gun down so he could just sneak over the top of the roof line and tink, ding, ding, maybe because he was concerned about how high he was. Now, I'm less concerned that that actually happened for two reasons. One, that kid just ran across the roof like, do-to-do, do, do totally upright, like not a care in the world, just like, do-to-do, do, jogging across the whole roof line.

So I don't think he was carrying enough that he's going to need those extra couple inches to bring that gun down.

Plus, we saw his head popped up in the Dave Stewart film, right? He's, you can see him from somebody standing just off of that big building looking up. That would be one of the hardest angles to see somebody. And point, there's Crook's head. And we saw his head 5.3 seconds before the shooting first shots were heard. So he's just up, you know, looking around. And by the way, there's not a lot of time to go from 5.3 seconds to this and get on. That's not a lot of time, even if it started right at that moment. So the way we're looking at this now is we said, well, our scientific process, obviously we have red, yellow, green data, we like the green data, we work with a lot that's video it's audio it's pictures that we can trust and then we start our analysis and begin to resolve the mysteries and uncertainties and we've we've resolved a lot of mysteries we know a lot about this whole shooting at misadventure now we we really have pretty good handle on the timeline and on what did happen

and what didn't happen and things like that. But then we have to form our hypothesis. The null

hypothesis, Crooks is the only shooter. Shot eight shots, shot number nine and ten. Those were

...