meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Timcast News

Tulsi Gabbard Launches $50M Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton For Defamation Over INSANE Russia Theory

Timcast News

Timcast Media

News, Politics

4.67.4K Ratings

🗓️ 22 January 2020

⏱️ 103 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Tulsi Gabbard Launches $50M Lawsuit Against Hillary Clinton For Defamation Over INSANE Russia Theory. Late last year Hillary Clinton alluded to Tulsi Gabbard in a statement saying she was being groomed by Russians. At least that's how everyone took it considering Clinton's spokesman came out and said "if the nesting doll fits" when confronted by a CNN reporter.

For some reason tons of media outlets quickly changed the narrative by claiming Hillary said "republicans" and was not referring to Russians. If that were true why make the nesting doll reference?

Well now Tulsi is fighting back with $50M dollar lawsuit against Clinton saying that the claims hurt her and her campaign.

What is even more hilarious is that several pro Hillary democrats and far leftists are claiming that Tulsi is in fact an asset of Russia and that Hillary was right. They are quite ironically proving Tulsi's lawsuit has merit by showing they believe the absurd theory of Hillary Clinton that Russians were grooming Gabbard or at the very least thats what they assumed Hillary was saying.

Support the show (http://timcast.com/donate)

Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Tulsi Gabbard has launched a $50 million lawsuit against Hillary Clinton for defamation

0:07.4

because Hillary Clinton alluded in a podcast that Tulsi Gabbard was an asset of the Russians.

0:13.2

What makes this story so absolutely insane is the weird background to how the media tried to cover

0:19.6

up for Hillary Clinton after she insinuated Tulsi Gabbard was a Russian asset. Right now the big

0:25.2

defense from all the Democrats is, but Hillary never said Tulsi's name. It's really funny. So

0:30.1

many blue checkmark verified resistance members are defending Hillary Clinton. They didn't actually

0:36.0

read Gabbard's press release or lawsuit, which clearly outlines the smear why it was about her

0:43.1

and how you can tell it's about her. But I tell you this man, this sets Tulsi Gabbard well

0:49.2

apart from Bernie Sanders who won't even defend his own supporters. Tulsi Gabbard, she won't back

0:54.8

down. She called Hillary Clinton a very, she called her the personification of rot and a war

1:00.0

monger among other things. Hillary Clinton comes out or actually, I think it was Hillary Clinton came

1:04.7

out first insinuated that Tulsi Gabbard was a Russian asset. Tulsi fired back immediately.

1:09.6

Looking what Bernie Sanders did the other day. This is the, I know I'm rehashing this, but I just

1:13.8

want to go through real quick. Bernie's own campaign sent an email calling Joe Biden corrupt.

1:19.2

Bernie's supporters then tweeted in his defense. Bernie then apologized to Joe Biden,

1:24.5

basically like niphing in the back his own supporters. But anyway, this, this story is about Tulsi

1:30.0

Gabbard. So I got a bunch of stuff I want to pull out and I want to go through here. I got Tulsi

1:32.5

Gabbard statement. But what's really funny about this is that in the lawsuit from Tulsi Gabbard,

1:36.9

there are several swipes at Hillary, like basically poking her over her failures. It's kind of

1:43.3

man, Tulsi is is brave, brave, brave. Let's let's read the story from Fox News.

1:47.9

Before we get started, head over to Timcast.com slash donate. If you'd like to support my work,

1:52.4

there's a PayPal option, a crypto option, a physical ad, just the best thing you can do. However,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Timcast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Timcast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.