Okay, Greenland. Let's talk about Greenland. Trump announces framework for Greenland deal

won't say if U.S. ownership still needed. Okay, so check this out when they're going

through this. The position changed a few times at Davos, okay? But here's the president with a tweet,

based upon a very productive meeting I had with the Secretary General of NATO, Mark Ruddy,

we have formed the framework of a future deal with respect of Greenland, and in fact, the entire Arctic region,

this solution of consummated will be a great one for the United States, America, and all NATO nations,

based upon this understanding, I will not be imposing the tariffs

that were scheduled to go into effect on February 1st. Additional discussions are being held

concerning the Golden Dome as it pertain to Greenland. Further information will be made available

as discussion progresses and he's got the rest that's there. This was a topic of discussion,

Rob. I don't know what clips you have on this

from Davos. There was multiple, multiple conversations. So, you know, is this him giving, is

this him talking about it? This is why it, this is him explaining why we need Greenland because

of what happened in World War II. Go ahead, Rob. Go ahead.

We saw this in World War II when Denmark fell to Germany after just six hours of fighting

and was totally unable to defend either itself or Greenland.

So the United States was then compelled.

We did it, we felt an obligation to do it, to send our own forces to hold

the Greenland territory and hold it we did at great cost and expense. They didn't have a chance

of getting on it and they tried. Denmark knows that. We literally set up bases on Greenland for Denmark.

We fought for Denmark.

We weren't fighting for anyone else.

...