Trump Shockingly Reversed as MAGA Supreme Court Gets Ignored?!?
Legal AF by MeidasTouch
Meidas Media Network
4.9 • 6.1K Ratings
🗓️ 6 September 2025
⏱️ 16 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | In breaking news, in just four days, Donald Trump is on an epic losing streak, now suffering |
| 0:05.5 | his third loss this time at the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. court. |
| 0:10.4 | And a two-to-one decision has now blocked his efforts to fire the only remaining Democrat on the |
| 0:17.1 | Federal Trade Commission, citing a 90-year-old precedent, which the Supreme Court may be chipping away at, |
| 0:23.7 | but has not removed entirely, called Humphrey's executor. In fact, as noted by the two-to-one decision |
| 0:30.0 | of Judge Millett and Judge Pallard against Judge Rayo, a Trump supporter, a Trump nominee, |
| 0:37.4 | the actual case of Humphrey's executor, which is the |
| 0:40.8 | precedent going back 90 years that says a president cannot fire anyone from the Federal Trade |
| 0:47.4 | Commission. This is what the case says, from the Federal Trade Commission without cause, |
| 0:52.8 | which has always been interpreted as inefficiency, |
| 0:56.1 | neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office, all those things happening in office. |
| 1:01.3 | The actual case of Humphreys executor, Humphreys was a Federal Trade Commission commissioner. |
| 1:07.0 | I can't think of a case that's on all fours more than this case. |
| 1:10.8 | And what the two-to-one decision was, and they actually call out the... I can't think of a case that's on all fours more than this case. |
| 1:21.8 | And what the two to one decision was, and they actually call out the United States Supreme Court, finally, I'm going to, they're just getting tired of getting reversed by the Supreme Court. |
| 1:28.7 | And what the D.C. appellate panel here, two to one, said to the Supreme Court is, we're not going to do your job for you you want to overturn Humphrey's executor then you overturn it but we see it as the precedent binding in |
| 1:35.1 | this circuit certainly about a federal trade commission commissioner and the president having |
| 1:40.3 | illegally fired that person and that's the precedent we're going to follow until you change |
| 1:46.5 | it. Challenging the Supreme Court to, quote, quote, do its job. I'm Michael Popak. I'm doing my job. I'm here on the |
| 1:53.0 | Midas Dutch Network and on Legal AF. Let's get into the case of Rebecca Slaughter. The Federal Trade |
| 1:59.2 | Commission, as noted by the two to one panel, is a commission |
| 2:04.7 | that was formed a hundred years ago, more than a hundred years ago. It's led by a group of |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Meidas Media Network, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Meidas Media Network and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

