Atheists, agnostics, long-haired widows, short-haired widows, vandal,

gulagos.

I love the government, hug the government, hug the government, hug the government, love, the government, hug the government.

Welcome to the politics, guys, a place for bipartisan, rational, and civil debate on American politics and policy.

I'm Northern Kentucky University Political Scientist, Michael

Barronowski. I'm joined today by not one but to co-host, my conservative counterpart, Cleveland

Area Attorney and Defender of Freedom, Jay Carson, as well as University of Northern Iowa

political scientist Justin Holmes. Jay and Justin, welcome back. Good morning. Good to be here.

So there were a number of things, guys, that we didn't have time to get to on the regular show.

Starting with, actually, another Donald Trump trial issue. And with I think it's 91 indictments and all kinds of other things

going on, it's hard to keep track. And in the last week or so, so much of the focus has been on

his January 6-related trial, that other federal criminal trial concerning Trump's alleged

retention of classified documents,

that's been getting less attention, although in the last week, prosecutors asked the judge in

the case, Eileen Cannon, to set a July 8th start date. Now, Donald Trump's attorneys have been

saying from the beginning that in the interest of fairness, the trial should be delayed until

after the November presidential election. But they said, well, if you can't do that in a recent

filing, how about August 12th as an alternative? Now, that if the judge went that way, would

potentially complicate the government's efforts to try Trump on the January 6th case,

which were, of course, waiting on the Supreme Court immunity ruling on, in what could be

an overlapping window, depending on how and when the Supreme Court rules on that other case.

On Friday, March 1st, Judge Cannon held a hearing concerning the scheduling, and as of the

...