Alex Bruceowitz, thank you for doing this. Very nice of you to do this. So here's my

perception. Here's the overview. So we're in this war. Obviously, I disapprove, whatever,

I've said that many times. Then the president decides we're getting out, and the vice president articulates how and why and

I couldn't be more supportive of that I was thrilled by that thank god and then all of a sudden

there is this just flurry of attacks on the president but mostly on on the vice president, from people who don't

have a alternative plan, but basically just calling the vice president to someone's on the president

names. It seemed to me as an outsider, less fluent in the internet than you are, that this is

coordinated. Like, what is this? What are we looking at? Well, it's a great observation. I believe that there definitely is a coordinated effort

for, to put pressure on the president and the administration to continue the conflict in Iran.

And I believe that there is potentially even foreign influence involved, and, you know, not just from one country. So I think it's definitely

a coordinated effort. You're seeing a lot of these voices, they kind of move as a pocket. They talk

about a lot of the similar issues. They oftentimes do the similar paid media campaigns around

other related topics. And there's also evidence of millions and millions and millions of dollars flowing to

certain right-wing influencer marketing companies from countries who might benefit from a

prolonged conflict.

So I believe there's definitely a coordinated effort.

Similarly, right after the war was about to end,

or I guess the MOU was coming out,

a lot of the anti-war voices were also spreading misinformation about the deal.

They were pushing a line about how the United States taxpayers were somehow

going to give $300 billion to Iran. And I look at people like Thomas Massey, who's spent on this

program, he was very quick to share the statement saying that this MOU is terrible because we're

...